This channel is pure fun, and with more subscribers than Taylor Swift, it’s a big hit both in the U.S. Now, her channels draw billions of views from fans who enjoy the fun adventures of Nastya and occasional co-stars like her dad, her cat, and her friends. Like Nastya Vlogis actually the main channel among a host of family-friendly channels by Anastasia “Nastya” Radzinskaya and her parents, including “Stacy Toys” and “Funny Stacy.” Anastasia was diagnosed with cerebral palsy as a baby, and her parents began documenting her progress as she grew by filming her doing ordinary things. This is one you’ll want to keep a closer eye on while your kids watch. There is plenty of fun content for kids here, but also lots of product placement and toy “unboxing” videos. Nearing 500 million views per week, CoCoMelon produces content with the stated goal of, “ learning a fun and enjoyable experience for kids.” However, virtually nothing is actually known about the people behind the channel, except that they are making around $120 million per year in advertising revenue. Which ones are really worth watching, and which ones are better to avoid? The Most Popular Kids’ ChannelsĬoCoMelon is not only the most popular YouTube channel for kids…it’s the most popular channel in the U.S., period.
Millions of kids tune in to these channels to generate billions of dollars in revenue for the platform and its stars.
ParentsTogether did a deep dive into the most popular YouTube channels for kids so you don’t have to. (We also know that you really don’t want to sit through dozens of PAW Patrol episodes any more than you already have to.)
In an ideal world, all parents would have the time to pre-screen every piece of content before their child sees it, but we all know this isn’t the reality. We conclude that bias due to ignoring life course variation in studies on intergenerational attainment is likely to be small.There are thousands of channels made for kids, but because there is very little regulation of the content on the platform, not all of these channels are as enriching or as educational as they might seem. The largest proportion of children's outcomes explained by these parental measures is shared and cannot be decomposed into independent effects. The independent effects are overall relatively small. The influence of class alone is minor and time constant, but the effect of income alone is negligible over the entire follow-up. Mothers’ education explains independently most in infancy, whereas that of fathers in early adulthood. We also find that independent, non-overlapping effects of observed parental indicators vary over time. These explanations vary only a little during children's life course. Status characteristics of fathers together explain approximately half of children's outcomes, and those of mothers explain slightly less. We show that parental education explains family variation in siblings’ occupation most and income explains it least. We fitted three-level random effects linear regression models and decompose family-level variance of siblings’ ISEI by each measure of parental status. Using Finnish register data, we matched the occupational position (ISEI) of 29,282 children with information on parents’ education, occupational class and income when children are 0–4, 5–9, 10–14, 15–19, 20–24 and 25–29 years old. We analyse how socioeconomic characteristics of mothers and fathers over children's life course explain children's occupational outcomes in adulthood. Very few studies on intergenerational achievement consider the high correlation between separate measures of parental socioeconomic position and possible life course variation in their significance for children.